Are you looking for a new tennis racket but not sure which one to buy? Check out my advice on finding the best tennis racket and some of the best frames that I think are currently on the market.
This buying guide applies to the following situations:
People who are not suitable for this guide:
If you want this blog post to provide a list of the top 10 rackets currently available, then I have some bad news to tell you the best nicknames.
Although I will make some specific racket suggestions at the bottom of the page, the first point I need to emphasize is that there is no such thing as the "best tennis racket".
It is easy to label products of a particular category as the "best", such as a paper shredder or even a tennis machine, but this is not the case with tennis rackets.
You may stumble upon some tennis racket reviews and best guides that have told you that X is the best racket, but that is not the case.
why? Because what works for one player does not work for another player. Different racket specifications are suitable for different game styles.
Giving any racket the "best" condition is misleading, and the result is that consumers spend their hard-earned money on rackets that may not be suitable for their game.
Now that we have resolved this issue, I suggest you read this guide in its entirety to get a better understanding of tennis rackets, which will enable you to successfully find the best tennis racket for your game.
Jump on any tennis forum and you will soon realize that buying a new racket is a difficult and tricky decision for most players. There are hundreds of posts asking questions such as "Which racket should I buy?" "What is the best tennis racket brand?" "Which tennis racket is best for me?" "Is Wilson RF97 Pro Staff worth buying?" There are many more.
Read on and you will see responses from many well-meaning users who often share purely anecdotal evidence, which will only further confuse the process.
In fact, it is relatively simple when choosing a new racket. The best tennis racket for you is always: the heaviest racket you can hold, the type of tennis you play, and the time you spend on the court.
That's it; it is not a racket with the latest fancy technology, nor is it the RF97 used by Federer, nor is it the most modern and shiny racket on the market.
If you can find a tennis racket that can accelerate at all hitting points/contact points without getting tired quickly, then you have found the most suitable tennis racket for your game. So how do we achieve this?
The first step in finding the perfect tennis racket is: don't believe in the hype.
All marketing materials of the racket brand focus on the size of the sweet spot, the power of the racket, and various other buzzwords of little significance. They are just one-off terms that hope to appeal to you.
Although manufacturers may write in their press releases, there have been very few (if any) advancements in racket technology in the past 20 or 30 years.
Just like the world of the smartphone upgrade cycle, for tennis racket manufacturers, their business model relies heavily on persuading people to buy new tennis rackets more frequently than they need.
Assuming that you are not angrily hitting thousands of balls a week like Rafael Nadal, a well-made tennis racket can last for years. The manufacturer knows this and will definitely make every effort to sell you the latest and greatest technology.
Hitting a tennis ball with a racket is an example of an unbalanced force acting on a moving object. We are holding a heavy object (a racket) and hitting a lighter object (a tennis ball), hoping to see it cross the net and penetrate into the opponent's half.
You can put on your physics hat and study more deeply. Nevertheless, the process of momentum transfer means that the tennis racket has only five characteristics to control how it achieves the transfer of kinetic energy and the perception of the person using it. they are:
That's it! The next job is to try to match each of these factors with the norms that suit your strengths, goals, and game style.
Although we all have our own preferences in terms of design, colors, or branded rackets used by our favorite players. The fact is that almost all major brands produce high-quality tennis rackets.
This usually means that rackets of almost the same specifications are completely interchangeable. If they are just a solid color, you may not notice any difference between two competing rackets when using them. In fact, the only difference is the shape of the grip and the color of the paint job.
This is why I suggest you forget terms such as "FlexFeel", "countervail" or "BLX". The way the racket is played depends entirely on the above five factors.
All rackets have different weights, swing weights, stiffness levels, line styles and head sizes. When you combine these characteristics in some way, you end up with rackets that belong to different categories. The categories are as follows:
The key to choosing the ideal racket for your game is to fix these five characteristics and find something that produces a deep ball with good speed and spin in a normal swing.
You should not feel that you have to swing harder, nor should you stop your normal swing to get the ball where you want it. When playing a racket, you should not think about the racket, as professionals often say; it should be an extension of your arm. Let's see how we got to that point.
Weight is the first element that determines the strength of the racket. The equation is simple: the heavier the racket, the greater its power.
Unfortunately, for some reason, the story of an old lady spread, which means that many players believe that the opposite is true. I recently received this email that emphasized this point:
Many people in my club said that I should buy a heavier racket. They say that greater quality will give me more power. Others in the club said the lighter the better. However, when I check the racket and its specifications online, it always seems to be the lightest racket with a higher power rating. I don't know what to believe now. Does a heavier or lighter racket provide more power?
To understand why a heavier racket has more power, give an example: if you have a 400-gram racquet Wilson and a 200-gram racquet head, and you swing them at 150 mph, then the racquet Wilson hits the ball The power of the racket is twice that of the racket head.
This is the explanation in the textbook, but what needs attention here is how fast you can swing two rackets. If you are strong, then you may be able to swing two rackets at the same speed. However, most people will be able to swing a 200g racket faster than a 400g racket, but not twice as fast, resulting in a 400g racket still producing more power. Therefore, the trick is to find the right balance between your swing speed and racket weight.
With this in mind, I suggest you use the heaviest racket that can play well. This weight varies from person to person and does not depend on your skill level. It is based on your weight and physical condition.
To find a racket of the right weight, you need to demonstrate several rackets and see if you can swing them easily on all contact surfaces without getting tired quickly. This is why I recommend that you make sure to test the racket against players that are usually difficult to deal with.
Of all those who are currently playing with you, intending to play, or want to play in the near future, you must be able to catch the ball in time and be ready for a full normal swing.
No matter how heavy the racket is, anyone can crush the manual ball. Anyone can convince themselves that when they tested Aunt Anne and her forehand for 20 minutes, the racket was excellent.
The serious test here is, when you are playing a competitive game, when you are running, can you put your racket on the ball and hit the ball on time? Or are you always late? If you are often late, your racket may be too heavy.
If you can hit deeper when you have time to prepare to hit the ball, but it shortens under pressure or running, then your racket may be too heavy.
The reason is that when we hit the ball while running or higher bouncing balls, our main muscle groups become less involved, and the smaller muscles must take over and swing the same weight.
New players of the game usually buy very light rackets. Lightweight rackets are very easy to use, but they will prevent you from learning better shots.
A heavier racket encourages longer and full swings, which requires better technique and use more body.
On the other hand, more advanced players tend to increase the weight of the racket, making the racket too heavy. It feels great when warming up, but when the game starts, they will be late for contact because they try to pull too much weight too fast to handle it.
For ordinary adult men who often play games or plan to play a lot of games, regardless of technical level, I recommend using the following weight range: 290-320 grams (10.5-11.3 ounces).
The weight of a normal adult female should be slightly lower: 280-310 grams (10.2-11 ounces).
The weight quoted applies to an unwinded racket.
If you like, you can buy a heavier racket and plan to build some endurance/strength to use it.
But to ensure that the goal is realistic, will you put in the effort? If you are not ready to work, please do not buy a heavier racket to grow.
The balance of the racket is how the weight is distributed. On a balanced racket, the balance point is exactly halfway through the frame.
The balance basically controls one thing: the "swing weight" of the racket. When reading product descriptions or reviews, you will see the words top-heavy and headlight.
When more mass moves further from the center of rotation toward the hoop of the racket, this is the head weight. It makes the effective weight of the racket in contact with the ball greater than the actual weight. This adds more power to the frame, but at the cost of making the racket more difficult to swing and maneuver.
In theory, a head-heavy racket sounds very cost-effective, with lighter weight but plenty of power. But there is a trade-off and a big trade-off. During the swing, the weight of the frame's head will exert additional torque on the wrists, elbows, and shoulders.
This extra pressure means that a heavy head racket is an important cause of "tennis elbow" and other tennis-related injuries. This is why I recommend that you stay away from "beginner" tennis rackets. All you get is a racket, which will hinder the development of a stroke and increase your chance of suffering tennis-related injuries.
Instead, you should always choose a headlight frame, which means that the handle weighs more. These are given by the manufacturer in points. The exact degree of the headlight depends on the weight of the racket. Generally speaking, the heavier the racket, the stronger its headlights should be.
The hardness of the racket helps to improve strength and comfort. A harder racket will give you more power. A softer frame will absorb more energy from the ball and take power away from the shot. The harder the frame, the less it deflects or bends on impact, and the greater the force in the ball.
But what does this have to do with comfort? This is a tricky question, and it usually comes down to personal preference. But is softer always better? When the racket hits the tennis ball, it vibrates. On a harder frame, the vibration is more intense but shorter. On softer frames, they are less severe, but last longer.
Generally speaking, softer frames are more comfortable to play and are less likely to cause tennis elbow. But other players may find the opposite. When you combine stiffness with string type, grip size, string pattern, etc., a harder rated frame can feel as comfortable as, or even more comfortable, as a racket with lower stiffness.
In my experience, the type of tennis line you use has a much greater impact on comfort than racket stiffness, so this has never been my most important consideration. If you have or are worried about arm problems, try using a less rigid racket. The lower the value, the more flexible the racket, the higher the value, the harder the racket. Most RA levels are between 55 and 75.
The line type is related to the number of crosses and main strings on the racket, for example, 16 main strings x 19 crosses. In terms of how the racket is played, this mode affects the stiffness and rotation potential of the string bed.
A higher density string pattern, such as 18 x 20, will produce a stiffer string bed because it deflects less when it touches the ball. A lower density bed (such as 16 x 19) means a less rigid rope bed. The harder the string bed, the smaller the change when hitting the ball.
Perhaps the more important factor is spin. Since there is more space between the strings, the looser string pattern will produce more rotation than the tight string pattern; this creates more movement between them.
I recommend that most players use the more relaxed 16 x 19 mode, because getting spin is an important part of modern games. The exception is if you are a very flat batter who uses very little spin, in which case the tighter mode may give you a more consistent response.
Like stiffness, head size is another tricky area, saying that one is better than the other. When the head size is larger, you will find that the power that can be generated slightly increases. But this is trivial, saying that a 98 square inch frame is more powerful than a 95 square inch frame, and that all other specifications are the same is not always the case.
The result of using a racket with a larger head size is increased rotational stability because of the greater surface area of the string. The farther the weight of the frame is distributed from the center of the offline bed, the greater the force required to twist the racket in the hand.
Therefore, when you hit the ball off-center, the racket can resist more distortion, thereby reducing hitting errors and the ball flying to places you don't want. This is why you will see the word "forgiveness" in many racket reviews about larger head frames.
Just like weight, there is a trade-off here, because the wider the racket head becomes, the more difficult it is for the player to twist the racket. For example, adding more spin in an angled volley or when trying to close the face.
For most players. I recommend a head size between 98 and 100 square inches.
Now that we have put together these five things and some suggestions, the final recommended racket specifications you should look for are as follows:
280-320g, 5-12 nod headlights, 16×19 string patterns, 98-100 square inches head shape. After the presentation, I was stiff in personal preference.
For a typical adult woman:
270-310g, 3-8 nodding headlights, 16×19 string lights pattern, 98-105 square inches of head size. After the presentation, I was stiff in personal preference.
Based on the recommended specifications above, here are the five best rackets in my opinion currently on the market. However, before you rush to buy one of them, make sure you have read this guide in its entirety. Just because I recommend a racket does not mean it is an ideal choice for your game.
Yonex's latest EZONE 98 came out at the end of 2020, this is the racket endorsed by Nick Kyrgios. Of course, his specifications are slightly different from the retail version, but it is certainly the type of frame suitable for his race, because it has a lot of maneuverability, sufficient power, big sweet spots and excellent feel.
For me, EZONE 98 is one of the most user-friendly rackets. It is my first choice in 2021 because it suits many different game styles.
I know this is not a rigid "player" frame because it is fairly light and does require the correct string settings to ensure you gain control. However, Ezone 98 is an all-rounder very suitable for modern games, and it is definitely worth a try for intermediate and advanced players.
When I hit the ball with it, I think I can hit the ball almost immediately. This is not the case with many rackets, and it is a bit unexpected. Although I am a big fan of DR 98, I tend to tend to be heavier. Yes, control the type frame, because I played a fairly flat game.
But with Yonex EZONE 98, I gained a lot of power from the beginning. My serve is very explosive when it landed, and in front of the net, it provides a solid feel and stability, while maintaining the excellent playability and performance of the previous DR and AI models.
Are there any negative effects? It is slightly harder than the previous version, which may discourage some players who like the softer feel of the previous DR version of this racket, but I did not find it rougher on the arm.
Some players also said that they are struggling with control. I don't have this problem because it is strung together by a whole bed of RPM Blast, which seems to fit the frame well. So I will use control-oriented strings whenever possible.
Yonex also launched the Ezone Tour version of this frame, which is suitable for those who wish to be heavier in the 100, 100L and + (longer racket) versions.
As you might expect, the Tour model has a heavier scale and slightly different balance to provide more stability. I find the tour a bit tricky to play, and think the standard 98 is a better choice for most players, but if you like head weight, then the tour is definitely worth a demonstration. It’s also worth noting that I’ve read that some players found that the Tournament model is very harsh on the arm, so this is the last thing to pay attention to.
Another version released at the end of 2020 is the latest version of Wilson Pro Staff 97. Called V13, this is the racket I have used most often in the past six months.
I am not a big fan of the previous Pro Staff series, which is why I did not include them in the 2020 list, but this new model is a big improvement.
First, they got rid of the offsetting technique that I didn't like, but another big change was the grommet layup, which changed the chord pitch. This change means a more consistent response, and combine it with the more feeling that comes with no offset, and you will have the classic feel of Pro Staff.
If you want a more in-depth reading, I have reviewed Pro Staff 97 V13 in its entirety, but in short, this frame provides more feel, and the denser string bed provides you with more control.
It is essentially like a classic Pro Staff, but if you have never used the early iterations of this framework, it means that you have a good feeling, good stability and enough relaxing power when you swing the ball.
I really like this control-oriented framework, but I included Pro Staff 97 V13 on this list because I think many players can make good use of this racket. Everyone I have spoken to loves this framework.
It is not easy to play and requires you to hit the ball, but even if you are a novice, this framework forces you to not learn the correct and complete shot, making Pro Staff 97 V13 a good choice.
Like all Pro Staff rackets in the past, this is a framework that rewards a full swing. When you get in place early, it will give you enough power.
It is not easy to hit the ball into the muscles with a racket like this, but if your legs are working well and your feet are in the right position, when you swing fast, you will get a heavy ball that penetrates the court.
Wilson Pro Staff 97 V13 specifications
As one of the best-selling rackets since the millennium, Babolat Pure Drive has been transformed in 2021. Babolat is known for its powerful power and ease of use. While retaining these features, it adds something called the HTR system, a different layup method that gives more power. Secondly, in order to improve comfort, Babolat's SWX Pure Feel, a viscoelastic rubber located between the carbon layers of the racket.
This frame uses the same mold as the 2018 version, but Babolat has improved the feel of the frame, making it closer to the original Pure Drive in the early 1990s in terms of playability.
Pure Drive is a powerful rotating frame, so if this is what you are looking for, then this racket is on the shortlist.
It fulfills your expectations of Pure Drive, is very flexible, feels light, and has plenty of power. It is a true basic weapon.
This is not the most stable framework, so for players who want to feel, such as blocking back passes, half volleys, etc., then this may not suit their tastes.
In terms of beauty, Babolat has done a great job on the new Pure Drive, which is one of the best-looking frames on the market today.
Looking aside, the reason why the racket appears on my list is because no matter what level of player you are, this racket will suit you. You can basically put it in the hands of any player and they can play.
If you are a beginner, please demonstrate this racket; if you are an intermediate player, please demonstrate this racket; if you are an advanced player, please demonstrate this racket. You understand the point 🙂
Pure Drive is one of the most popular rackets for a reason. It may be a racket that I blindly recommend to any player who knows nothing about their game.
The only thing that really needs attention is that it is a rigid frame, so it may cause arm problems. If you are a player who naturally hits a big ball, you may try to maintain consistency, but other than that, it is Reliable purchase at all levels.
Over the years, I have used several Wilson Blades, and it has always been my favorite racket. Although I did not choose it as my preferred framework, it is easy to understand why Blade 98 is one of the most popular and well-known rackets.
The latest version of the Blade series is the 2019 version, called Wilson Blade 98 16 x 19 V7, which is equipped with what Wilson calls FeelFlex technology, similar to FreeFlex in the much-watched Wilson Clash series.
Although this is a typical gimmick marketing style name, it does mean that this iteration of Blade has a slightly more flexible framework designed to provide a more bag feel. After using V7, I found that this is indeed the case, which is part of the reason for my favorite version of Blade so far.
Before we understand the details of this framework and why I like it, I have to say that I think the Blade design is top-notch, and it is one of my favorite rackets. Of course, this should not affect the purchase decision (we all know it will affect 😆) but the smooth appearance of this frame makes it easy to understand why it has been the best seller for many years. So, how does it play?
The Blade I use is a 16 x 19 model, using Babolat RPM Blast serial connection (55 lb serial connection), no other modifications. Quite a rotation/control-oriented setting. This is not my natural style of play, but I have played hundreds of times with RPM Blast, so this is ideal for a quick understanding of how frames are played.
After playing a few shots in anger, my first thought was that V7 offers more feeling than the Countervail version a few years ago.
I think the ball on my string is a bit longer, which is ideal for my game, because I often use the cut ball on the backhand and there are quite a few variations.
One of my criticisms of the last Countervail version of Blade 98 is that it has a rather soft feel. Countervail technology seems to have taken away some feedback from the racket, but V7 is not the case.
This is not to say that V7 will be better for everyone. The damping of the CV version will still attract many players, especially those who grew up with harder and quieter rackets. However, I think this version of the racket plays better than the Countervail model, which feels a bit like I'm playing the pan on some shots.
Compared with the 2015 Blade 98, the older racket provides you with more power and stability, but is hard on the arm, while the latest V7 version is more comfortable and easier to play.
The biggest advantage of Blade 98 V7 is comfort and feel. In my opinion, it is not as good as Yonex Ezone 98, but with Blade 98 V7, you will get a smooth feeling when hitting the ball, and the 16 x 19 string mode provides plenty of controllable power because the strings are relatively close. In front of the net, the weight of 305 grams provides excellent control and you will be able to score with a powerful volley.
In general, this is a sturdy racket, another advancement in the Blade series, and it has been popular since it was first launched with nBlade. The perfect combination of control and feeling, while still providing rotation and power, means that I can say that there is nothing I particularly dislike.
If you are a player who pays more attention to control and like to mix it with many changes, then Blade 98 V7 may be your new weapon choice. If you like to hit topspin like Nadal from the bottom line, then other rackets are more suitable for your game.
Wilson Blade 98 16 x 19 V7 specifications
If you are a member of a tennis club, you will undoubtedly see many players using Babolat rackets. There are good reasons for this, because they have made very playable frameworks suitable for many different game styles. My favorite racket from this French company is Pure Strike 16×19, which is Dominic Thiem's first choice.
With Pure Strike, Babolat produces top-quality modern rackets. Compared to earlier models (I played with Roddick Pure Drive for a while), it is a more controllable racket that provides excellent feel, fast handling around the net and when off the ground feels like you put the ball on On a rope.
It uses a square and oval hybrid frame structure, and uses Babolat'FSI Power' technology. Now we know that it's just marketing nonsense. But because of the wider spacing between the upper cross strings, it does seem to translate into more rotation.
On the court, Pure Strike is characterized by a firm response that is both lively and precise. I also like how Babolat thickens the beam to increase stability, and you can easily generate enough power and rotation from the frame. It can also bring some relaxing power when you serve, so it is ideal if you want to get some extra pop music on the first serve.
After using K Factor Pro Staff for a while, I have always liked the classic player frame style racket, which provides a lot of control. Although Pure Strike does provide these aspects, it integrates the best attributes of modern players' rackets.
As compared to 18 x 20, I prefer the 16 x 19 variant because it has rotational potential compared to 18 x 20. Although it is not as flexible or fast as Pure Drive, I don’t think many players will be swinging. I encountered a problem with this 305g framework.
I don't think I have seen any comments about Pure Strike go wrong in negative ways, and I agree: Babolat produces high-quality rackets.
Pure Strike 16 x 19 has excellent control and excellent feel, allowing you to easily gain power and rotation. Its weight is very stable. According to my test, you can get the mobility associated with a lightweight racket and the stability of a heavier racket.
Pure Strike 16 x 19 has everything: plenty of control, feel, rotation, stability and power, all in a lightweight 305g frame, very easy to swing.
Like most mass manufacturers, quality control may be different, so if you buy a matching pair, please ask the retailer to try to get them as close as possible on the spec sheet as there are reports that some frames are not quoted Very far from glasses.
Babolat Pure Strike 16 x 19 specifications
Wilson's Clash series is basically their new flagship product. It is said that Wilson spent five years developing Clash to produce a racket designed to eliminate the notion that harder rackets are always stronger.
They did this by introducing two new "innovations". I put it in quotation marks because I find it difficult to use the word when talking about rackets, but I would say that Wilson created something unique.
These two new manufacturing processes are called FreeFlex and Stablesmart. These concepts are designed to allow the racket to bend in different ways and are achieved by laying carbon fiber at different angles to create new bending points that cannot be achieved by competitive rackets.
When you consider a stable racket, we expect it to provide power, spin and control. However, for stability, rackets are usually heavier, stiffer, or both.
Wilson Clash 100 Tour has an unwinded weight of 310 grams and an RA stiffness rating of 55, which is neither. Although the beam of Clash is quite thick, it is very flexible and provides comfort and feel. So does Wilson marketing live up to the hype and provide great power performance and great comfort?
I would say a bit. Of all the rackets I recommend in this guide, this one is probably the most unique. I'm not sure what its other rackets look like. Maybe it is Babolat Pure Drive or I recommend it to one of the advanced ProKennex players.
But most importantly, this is a powerful, crisp and easy to rotate frame, but still comfortable and flexible. My favorite in the lineup is the Tour model because it is the most stable in the series, which is why I included it in this list. I have not tried the Clash 98 model, it may be more suitable for my game.
When I hit the ball with Clash for the first time, it took some time to get used to it. I found it tricky to determine the exact location of the ball after contact, but after 15 minutes of hitting the ball with a stable baseline, you will get a little used to it.
I am a fairly flat two-wing batsman. Obviously, the Clash series is not designed for this style of play. This is a large rotating racket, suitable for those who like to sit behind the bottom line and have a modern Khachanov, Kyrgios style next-generation modern forehand.
I moved my hand to a more west-facing grip and used more windshield wiper styles, and quickly discovered that this is the most suitable place for Clash Tour, so it’s great for those seeking easy power, rotation, and more. For players with flexibility and comfort, Clash Tour is a good choice.
It is also the most arm-friendly on my list, while still being stable. This may be due to the thick beam design, so if this is what you are looking for, I suggest giving Clash 100 a demo.
Although this is not my personal racket, I like Wilson Clash Tour because it suits many modern game styles and there are many players seeking comfort. This racket is a good choice.
A cool design, interesting specifications, I think many players will find that they can use this racket to spin more and find more angles.
I would say that Wilson Clash is very similar to Babolat Pure Drive, but the comfort is greatly improved. If you like this style of racket and Clash suits your style of playing, then you are likely to be a winner.
Wilson Clash Tour is definitely not for everyone, but it is a viable option for many players, especially those who are worried about easy injury to their arms.
The last racket on my list is the VcorPro 100; it is a good choice for players who are just starting out and mid-level players who are looking for a lighter frame that is still in full swing. Has very good accuracy.
The lighter weight makes this racket very suitable for doubles because it is very flexible. Although it lacks quality and plowing in the heavier VcorPro 97 model, the combination of speed, control and rotation produces a stable racket, given that I am a big fan of Yonex rackets because of their quality control , This racket got me praise.
This model has a new throat structure designed to help topspin and the traditional Yonex isometric head shape. It plays very similar to the VcorPro 97 310g, but is easier to swing.
I found it easy to generate the head speed with this racket. For a 300g racket, it has a good power level from the baseline.
Online, players who approach and pray on the flanks may prefer a racket with more weight behind, because I would say that the VcorPro 100 does not have the best spin stability, but it does provide a lot thanks to 21mm Light beam, touch screen players feel better.
Serve wisely. This racket is more suitable for spin and precision than an out-and-out sledgehammer, but I can get a good speed when serving. For some reason, I always seem to use the Yonex racket to serve better. . I'm not sure about psychology or anecdotes, but this racket works well for my serve, because I think I can really add some whips to improve MPH.
I named this racket a good choice for intermediate players, and I think it fits the mold very well. It is easy to play, but the swing weight is slightly higher than the previous model, it provides enough stability, and is not too easy to be pushed from the baseline.
Against a strong batsman, the torsional stability may be affected a bit, but I like everything this frame provides for most players.
It is also very comfortable to play; this may be because Yonex has added a shock-absorbing net to the handle to help reduce unnecessary vibration. Whether it is as effective as advertised is open to question, but I found it to be very friendly.
I also feel that the ping sound during contact in VcorPro 100 becomes dull. I occasionally use shock absorbers to eliminate noise (or power pads), but this is a quieter frame, which may be due to the damping of the handle.
The best description of Vcore 100 300g is versatile, because it does a good job in many ways. For control players who want a lighter weight player frame, I think VCORE Pro 100 is a good choice.
For anyone who has used the previous iteration of Vcor Variety.
Yonex VCore Pro 100 G specifications
After writing this article, someone asked me why my top 5 tennis rackets did not include the latest Wilson RF 97 Autograph racket? Well, the answer is simple, I have already written in a dedicated post whether you should buy RF97. But the short version is:
Currently, few players can take advantage of RF 97. This is a great racket, but in many cases, you will pay for it. To me, this is a waste of money!
Therefore, if this is the design you want, please purchase the standard Pro Staff 97 V13. Believe me, when you step on the court, you may feel like Federer, but after 5 minutes of the game, when you make a lot of unforced errors, this feeling will soon disappear 🙂
So there you have it, a fairly in-depth guide on how to find the best tennis racket for your game. Please keep in mind that the above content is based on my own experience of buying, testing and helping others choose tennis rackets. Your personal experience may vary.
In addition to everything I wrote, the most important thing about buying a new racket is that you like it. The feel, play and appearance of the racket. If the racket feels too hard, too fragile, too quiet, too light or too heavy, the grip does not feel right, you hate the color, or if there is any damage when hitting the ball, then it is an inappropriate racket for you.
If you have to consider the equipment in your hands, you will not reach your full potential. You should be able to pick up your racket and play it without hesitation. Hope this guide can help you find the right one 🙂
Do you have a question about the racket? Are there recommendations for rackets that I should add to my list? Need some advice? Leave a comment below or contact me, I will get back to you as soon as possible.
Looking for a new racket? Using our easy-to-use racket finder tool, you can filter every racket on the market by specifications, price, and game style. Try the racket detector
No spam, only the latest tennis news and guides.
Wow! This is now a comprehensive guide. well-done. Yonex DR98 no longer exists. It was replaced in 2019 by the less popular "DR-free" version. I would also add that the racket has no "technique". It is just static materials and geometry. I usually measure the weight limit of a racket like this: High-end: in service and smash. If it is too heavy, I will feel it immediately. I have to start swinging earlier and focus on doing it the right way. This is very useful for cleaning techniques, but it makes me feel tired. Low end: My ground shots have become short and jerky, and my foot work has become very lazy...
Yes, I agree with too much marketing content about "technology". Perhaps the only one with a little credibility is the Clash series, because I think they have changed its manufacturing process, but I haven't really studied it yet. I think it feels weird when I hit it, but it is actually very good.
I think that, overall, being too light may be worse than being too heavy. But they all prevent you from performing at your best.
The conflict sucks. For Pro Staff users, the flexibility is too great. Throw my ball over the fence lmao
Guess this is a marmite racket. However, I have seen many players using it, and it is worthy of most players to demonstrate.
Thanks Jonathan for this great article!
Hey Jonathan, you surpassed yourself here. I don't like the fuchsia tight band. I hate the color on the racket. Otherwise, cheers!
Championship grip. I don't mind the colors, but I don't like how they feel. Wilson Pro Overgrip My favorite.
If you sweat a lot, Wilson Pro is great, but because my right hand doesn't sweat, it only feels good for a few minutes. After that, it will become dry and slippery like a peach skin. (I'm thinking about writing something about over-gripping these days. Will it be useful?)
Yes, deffo, I have a list of post ideas, overgrips is one of them...
Jonathan, great article! How do you compare Babolat Pure Strike's 16×19 and 18×20? Also, what do you think of Head Graphene 360 Speed Pro (Novak's racket)? I want to buy 1 of these 3, thank you very much for your help! Which one would you buy?
For Pure Strikes, the string mode will depend on your own preference? If you are an ultra-flat batsman and looking for control, then 18 x 20 may be for you. If you want more rotation, 16 x 19. I prefer 16 x 19.
Graphene 360 is very similar to Pure Strike IMO. 18 x 20 But as far as I know, the strings on the frame are very spaced. I think the racket will be updated soon, so the price may drop.
If I had to choose, I would choose Pure Strike (even the 2017 models, because they would be cheaper if you can find them) but there is almost nothing to separate them. Can you demonstrate it?
it's great! I will try to demonstrate. Very helpful, thanks again.
Hi Jonathan, Yonex Ezone DR98 seems to be an older racket. Most stores no longer sell them. Are there similar models on the market now? In addition, what do you think of Head Graphene 360 speed MP? Thanks!
thanks. Yes, I need to update that Yonex, it is part of my old post about rackets, and then I made a major update to the post. I also like the latest Yonex Ezone 98, 305g. And I believe I will also like the new models that will be launched soon.
I have hit the professional version of the head, but not the MP. I'm not a big fan of graphene, but these latest versions are definitely the best iterations. According to what I know about MP, it is more arm-friendly than the previous Touch one. It all depends on how you play? For a rapidly oscillating baseline, it must be a demonstration. Someone who keeps catching the ball? Maybe something more stable is needed.
I demonstrated Wilson Pro Staff 97L, and it was great. The light version of the Wilson Pro Staff, which does not offset the technical weight, is very balanced and hits the ball very well. I do like it better than the pure strike 16X19. I prefer the feel of hitting the ball. However, I did get better accuracy through pure strikes.
Cool. From what I have read, due to the weight of the swing, its playing is heavier than it actually is, so it still feels stable. I hope that the PS series will be updated as soon as possible, and not a fan of tuxedo black and white paint work. Even the Fed fired him after about 2 games.
Digress here... but who is watching the ATP Cup? Some good tennis...support the GB team. Why didn't I warm up to DeMinaur? Shabo's shot was very good. Those fans who are not named in the arena should be guided. Whistle and yell during the serve. In any case, it may be another result.
Have you seen the Fed’s AO gear? I think I will get sick.
I am, at least I can watch the game due to the time zone. This is the same as the previous Davis Cup competition system. As an individual sport, at least this allows the "national" team to book most of their best players and gives some meaning to "country A defeats country B", even if the national value of the players' achievements is limited. The quality of some games is very good, the "semi-official" feature allows a little relaxation (no player likes to lose, even for charity) and some spectacular games.
Thank you for the very useful article. I have played tennis for more than 35 years, and I still remember that graphite rackets are a novelty (and gradually become mainstream). In the past 20 years, most racquets used by IV have hardly changed. I think the feel of my "default" (head prestige mp) racket is slightly different, but, in my opinion, the biggest change over the years is the stringing technique. Strings are much better now. The polymer achieves comfort and durability unheard of 20 years ago. Regarding the racket, even though I have tried to change the racket, I continue to use the same racket because it is the most suitable for my game: the iconic Head Prestige MP (18X20). I think the most important thing is that this instrument (racket) is just a complement to your arm. Stick to what works for you instead of listening to all spam marketing BS. Thank you for the well-informed article.
Yes, no matter what a manufacturer like you tells you, racquet technology has hardly changed in the past 30 years.
I think you can say that there are some small innovations, Prince’s O Port grommet, small adjustments to the throat design/shape, Yonex’s Isometric stuff, Wilson Clash is fun to play, but other than that, the rest is marketing garbage 😀
They must continue to make money, and the way to do this is to convince you that every new model is a revolution. When we pile up more rackets than we need, the manufacturer makes a profit (guilty).
I think Yonex has the best quality control. You can easily match the racket without adding weight everywhere like Wilson. Good post.
I like this article, just like all other articles on this site. I found them to be very direct, fair and honest. What makes Yonex stand out? Is it a combination of isometric head and Japanese facts? Is there anything else? I feel that there is a common belief that whenever you see something "Made in Japan", you will know that it is of the best quality. The same belief applies to their cars.
For me, Yonex has the best quality control on the market. If you try to match 3 rackets, you will usually pick up 3 rackets, and if it's not cost-effective, they are almost identical. This is not the case with Wilson and others.
I also think their frame plays very well, DR98 is a very good racket. Many people still want them today. This is why I recommend them. Is it because they are Japanese? Maybe they did produce high-quality Toalson strings, for example, great.
This is based on an objective basis. Say (insert some non-Japanese manufacturer) there is this to produce a connecting rod with a length of 50 mm +- 2 mm. The output will be 51.9, 48.8, 50.7, etc. The same parts made in Japan with the same specifications will be produced as: 50.00, 50.01, 49.99, etc. Then people will be surprised that their Honda/Toyota/Mazda does not leak or consumes fuel after 200,000 kilometers... …
Hello Jonathan, thank you for your wonderful article. The amount of information is huge. I have never played Yonex, but want to try it. From the specification point of view, I prefer Yonex Vcor98 first, because I prefer the "smaller" beam. Have you tried this racket, and if so, do you have any comments on it compared to Ezone 98? Thanks!
It depends on how you play?
I will conduct a full review of Vcor But judging from the early hits, I think it's very good to play, and it feels crisp. Based on other reviews, I expected less feeling, but it's good in hybrids. Somewhat similar to Ezone 98 tbh.
If you can wait a month or two, then you will get a complete picture of the frame, although from my perspective.
Tennis Nerd also has a review worth checking out – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GV5nmSIago
I found your article very interesting, but I strongly disagree with your premise that the racket head should be 98-100 square inches. Scope. My first question is-who is your audience? The vast majority of 3.0-4.5 club players will benefit a lot from having a racket measuring at least 105 square meters. Some countries/the best age-division players in the world (ie Mark Vines, Mike Tammen, etc.-use a 110 square inch racket, allowing them to fully control and serve/volley/ground shot/etc... they Being able to take full advantage of the bigger head size and bigger sweetness. My advice to almost all accomplished players is to get used to using a lighter racket with a bigger head. I have achieved a good B-level Players who use 115 sq.in. Head Instinct PWR for the score. It’s 8.1oz. No string, and because it’s made with a length of 27.7in-I found that when I cut the handle short to reach the standard 27-inch length, it was More popular. When a good multifilament (NXT 16 size 64-68 lb) is correctly stringed, it will become a racket that dozens of accomplished players like very much. So I predict that through a fair comparison In the process, a 110-115 square inch light racket will prove to be a great choice N%
Interesting idea, but I think this is usually not good advice for most players.
The players you mentioned are in their sixties after I searched on Google. When you get older and need a larger hitting area, more spin stability, and more fault tolerance, a larger head size makes sense. I have a guide on rackets for seniors, but this is more like an open age guide, focusing on rackets that can help you improve your players. It is difficult to improve with a 115 square inch racket because you are lazy and did not learn the correct strokes. But it is definitely one that you can transition to when you are older, and it feels helpful to your game.
If oversized rackets give players complete control and power in the game, they will be widely used in ATP tournaments. So, do professionals know nothing and miss all these advantages you said? Or do they realize that the lightweight, oversized racket provides less control when the racket face needs to be closed, lower accuracy, and more difficult to maneuver? I agree.
Of course, this is a horse for the course. I believe that many players think they can use the OS to play better, but the vast majority of players will play better tennis, learn better batting skills, and can better Something in the control range is 98 to 100.
I don’t think NXT is a particularly good line, so I think we come from different schools of thought in tennis😀
Interesting debate. Of course, I will never challenge the author Jonathan or his comments. You can classify me as a very good beginner or someone who has just reached the intermediate level. My performance on the court is very good. But I did not go all out. I just put the ball. Control has never been a problem for me, but power generation has always been a problem.
I bought Yonex Ezone 98 2020 and Yonex Vcore Pro 100 300 rackets. I have been a big fan of Yonex since I played badminton. Earlier I used Wilson Federer Pro 105. Compared with the Yonex racket, the head size of this racket is larger (105 square inches) and the unwinded weight (262 grams) is much lower. I also put a Wilson NXT 16 with a pressure of 57 pounds on this Wilson racket. I like this string because it gives me all the power I cannot produce. As I said, control has never been a problem for me.
Every time I play, I start with my Yonex because it should be better, and of course the price is more than twice as much. But the range of my Wilson racket is much better. Just yesterday, my Yonex Ezone 98 2020 was behind with a score of 1-3. I exchanged it with my Wilson, and in the end I won 6-4. This is not a one-off situation, I have tried this many times.
For me, larger head size, lighter weight and multifilament like NXT that you (Jonathan) do not recommend are actually effective. Is it because I am a good beginner and not an intermediate/advanced player? Does my Wilson racket make me lazy? Or is it really more suitable for my playing style?
In the end, there is no correct answer 🙂 What works for one player and not for another player.
I think you should find a racket you like and try to develop your game around it. I wrote this article based on what I know about the real situation of physics and some of my own experience. So I wrote it based on what I think is suitable for most players (assuming they are receiving some guidance, developing their game, etc.)
Any player struggling to generate power will benefit from a more power-focused framework, so if Wilson is right for your game, then I will use it.
I like multifilament, I just don't like NXT, they do something about manufacturing, which makes IMO not so good.
Thank you Jonathan, yes, this is a very personal thing, maybe this is beauty. Every player is different.
By the way, I think I have found a problem (only 2 hours ago) and I have solved it now. I set the tension to 57 pounds and installed shock absorbers. This creates a stiff string setting. I removed the shock absorber and the Yonex racket looks much better. I will update how I use it in the next few clicks.
Okay, it has been 2 months since I used Yonex Ezone 98. I used 57-pound Yonex Rexis strings to string it together.
I must say that due to the small power of this racket/string combination, I have now started to swing at full force. My service is great. Smaller players, some of whom think they are very good mid-level players, now ask me to relax when serving, otherwise they are afraid of injury. With a lot of control, I rarely make mistakes. My game has improved a lot.
When I thought that Wilson Federer Pro 105 and Wilson NXT 16 were a good combination, I was wrong. It has a lot of power, but it caused me to just tap the ball instead of swinging it at full force. Now using Yonex Ezone 98 with Yonex Rexis strings, my game is very good.
The lack of power is no longer a downfall. This is an advantage because I go all out and reduce errors. The only downside is that if I play 3 sets, I sometimes experience back pain, because it is 305 grams, and my previous Wilson racket is very light, only 262 grams. I have been suffering from back pain for the past 2 years, so I just need to strengthen my back.
Your article looks great. I am an intermediate player. I want to buy Yonex VCore Pro 100 300. I live in Australia. I found this racket in two places on the same website, and the price is very different: mydeal.com.au/yonex-vcore-pro-100-300g-tennis-racquet-956913
mydeal.com.au/yonex-vcore-pro-100-matte-green-300g-tennis-racquet-1124127
Is that racquet in a cheaper color than Matt Green another racquet? As the name suggests, they are the same or similar. Is it a Vcore racket instead of a Vcore Pro? If yes, where is it?
Sorry for the slow response.
I think one is just an older paint job?
I ordered 2 rackets for me and my friend (after reading this beautiful article): Yonex Ezone 98 (Me) Yonex VcorePro 100 300(Friend)
Now, I ordered factory strings. I hope they are Yonex strings. But the supplier said he got an unwinded racket. When asked to provide original strings, he only used the cheapest string (Dunlop's) and sent it over. He wants us to play a little bit, and then he wants us to readjust according to our preferences.
I am using Ezone 98 and I am intermediate. My court report is very good. I usually don't struggle for control, but it's really hard for me to make a strong shot. Which string do you suggest I use and what tension? For example, your answer might be Babolat RPM Blast 1.25 Rally 55
My friend is a very good beginner. His court reports are average. He works hard to control, but can make powerful shots very well. Which string do you recommend for him and what kind of tension?
Finally, if I use Yonex strings with Yonex rackets, or if I use any other strings with Yonex rackets, will it make any difference? Is it good to use the same brand of string as the racket? I assume not, but just want to confirm.
Oops, no, the 55-pound RPM Blast is too tight. It will feel too dead and uncomfortable. If you really want to use polyester, if you are struggling with strength, you can choose up to 52 or 50. You should use softer polyester instead of RPM, such as Luxilon Adrenaline at 51 lbf or Dunlop Black Widow at 53. This site has some *really awesome* string reviews😀 As for matching the brand’s strings and frames, it doesn’t matter. For beginner strings, a good starting point is 55 lbf of solid nylon (aka " "Synthetic gut", a terrible misnomer), no matter what the frame is, then check: if it feels too stiff/dead/weak, use nylon multifilament next. If it feels too elastic/soft/powerful and cannot spin on the ball, use polyester fiber next. Remember a simple rule of thumb: always keep the polyester rope 1 – 3 kgf (2-6 lbf) looser than the nylon rope. Happy hitting.
This is a wonderful article Jonathan 👍🏾 Thank you very much for educating players like me. I want to demonstrate and purchase Yonex ezone 98 (2020 model). In addition to the RPM explosion, are there other multi-wire mesh suggestions and the tension of this racket? I am looking for more control. As a mid-level player, my influence is not always great, but I have done my best. I hope this model will not be too stiff, they have a lighter version, 25g lighter and 1g or HL... I want to know if it can be considered, but I suspect that it is out of control there. Thank you if you can think about your ideas. Many thanks!
RPM Blast is a rigid polyethylene, so it is very suitable for controlling guided strings. Therefore, if you feel you need control, you can use poly, stretch the multi tightly, or use blending.
What racket and string do you use now?
Thank you for your prompt reply! I use volkl super G v1 pro racket and volkl cyclone. I think it is a bit heavy and my serve is terrible. Even the baseline ball ran home runs🙃 Of course, this is mainly because of my skills and not the racket. However, I used to play my friend's old Yonex racket (I believe it is the vcore si series). Even if it's a bit stiff, it's fine. The current Yonex Ezone 98 2020 model is a racket I am considering. And their 285g (unstring) model and 1 or HL is another model I haven't seen reviews for. The last iteration of Yonex Ezone 98 (305g) blue (I believe it was 2017) can be purchased at low prices in many places. Will I lose anything with the previous model? I'm not a fan of tension multifilament... I tried it earlier, but it couldn't be done very well. Moreover, it feels very poor. Either the RPM explodes 18 grams with the proper tension of 53, or 55 times the Babolat Xcel 16g, which is something I should try... Again, I am thinking about all of this out loud and then just type it out. Don't bother to reply to every point 🙃. Thank you again!
Excellent knowledge record Babolat Pure Drive LITE or YONEX EZONE 100SL (dark blue) which is better
Can't say which is better...they have almost the same specifications.
This is a wonderful article Jonathan and now I am looking forward to trying Babolat Pure Strike 16 x 19
Wow, well written, more meaningful than the usual advice of buying a light racket.
I am an enthusiastic beginner, 45 years old, reasonable size (may always be better), 2m high, 97kg. I play 2-3 times a week and attend classes. I also swim and ride bicycles. According to common suggestions, I got a 275g racket...
I think I need a heavier racket. I don't have enough experience to know what type of racket I like to play. I still need to do a lot of work on the swing. Would you recommend Ezone 100? I still need to increase it immediately. My long arms should allow quite a lot of racket speed.
Ezone 100 or 98 is a good racket. It is best to buy something with weight so that you can learn the correct stroke mechanics. But you don't need to be too heavy. If you feel you need more weight, you can add lead tape at any time, and it is impossible to reduce it.
I also recommend Clash 100, the new Pure Drive, and Pure Aero.
Can you demonstrate it first?
Thanks for this great article! I have always liked the latest Ezone 98 305g racket. Obviously, some people (mainly with two-handed backhands) say it is too light, but the weight and balance are just right for me as a non-professional one-handed hand.
thanks. Yes, the Tour mode seems to be the opposite-more suitable for two-handed backhands.
What do you think of the Head racket? Do you think Head has a good racket with similar specifications to the latest Ezone 98 (305g)? It is the quality control of Head co. As bad as Wilson/Babolai? Thank you so much,
Update in 2021. There are some other things to add 🙂
Not much to add, Jonathan 🙂 For those who are not tech freaks, I will add a single but useful suggestion. Never replace a racket you have used for a long time, and there is no real feeling that you need a new one. The racket frame does not wear out (if you don't hit the metal pillar (or partner's hard head;) often) instead of the ball, hahaha... I will end up playing with the line instead of the frame. But sometimes there is an unreasonable but irresistible need for a new framework-in this case, look for a new framework that may have a similar subjective feeling to your old framework... This is also my situation. Can't remember why and how I chose Dunlop 3hundred with mixed strings a few years ago (don't remember the model, but it came from Kirschner). I have used this racket, but I didn't find it. I don't like it. Than the "special" moment has come. I started to follow DT, so I wanted to try Babolat Pure Strike (2016 or 2017, I guess). I also have my old Dunlops (always a pair of the same model), with a fairly old hybrid kit and Babolat, he used DT strings two years ago. As far as my game level and style are concerned, I can change two frames during the game, and I don't feel any substantial (subjective) difference). So I can still accept the old Dunlop. But Pure Strike is not that popular in Poland (Heads are ruled)), so when I enter the stadium, I am mostly considered a member of Thiem-Team, which is what I want. After a game or two I can continue to use Dunlop, no one noticed, I just changed the racket 😉Only Tim had to cry for a while because of his ugly betrayal😉
correct. "There is nothing to add."
I am curious if anyone has tried pure drive 2021 compared to pure drive vs. vs. A thinner beam can make it more maneuverable, but is the racket still so strong and stable?
Its head is smaller and more flexible, so it is easier to swing and should provide more control. Stability-Technically speaking, due to the small size of the head, the stability of off-center shots will be slightly worse, but it can be ignored.
How does vcores in 2021 compare to the frameworks in this list, especially ezone 98?
I am waiting to test the new Vcore line. But from what I have seen from other reviewers such as Tennis Nerd, their performance is similar to the previous model I reviewed here: https://www.perfect-tennis.com/yonex-vcore-98 -review/, just a bit muted and predictable.
They are very spinning racquets. So the baseline for a big spin shot.
Ah, so for a more balanced game, ezone is probably a better framework. Thanks! Super useful, because the demo has not fully reached India yet.
Regards, and thanks for your article. Want to equip a young, inexperienced high school boys team? We had a good budget, and after seeing all the players from the rackets sold in the garage to the rackets of the ten-year-old brother came out for the first practice, I realized that I had to upgrade everyone. Thanks for any feedback.
I am not in the United States, so I don’t know the school well. You buy a racket for each student. Do they all use the same racket in the team?
I might choose something like Pure Strike, Pure Aero or Wilson Burn. Maybe it's the Wilson conflict. If they are like 11, 12, 13, etc., then I would choose a lighter model in these lineups of around 280 grams.
Hey, thank you for writing this article. I only have one question. What is the difference between Pure Strike 16×19 and Pure Strike 100 (2020) that you tested? I can only choose the latter demo, is it similar to the one you tested? thanks
Pure Strike 98 16 x 19 is a 98 square inch head, and Pure Strike 100 is a 100 square inch head. Otherwise, the specifications are almost the same.
Oh, yes, I see. Do you think that Pure Strike 100 will be slightly more suitable for less experienced players, because it may be more "forgiving" due to a greater sweet spot?
Tomorrow I will also demonstrate Blade 98 V7 and Clash 100. Any suggestions for demos? I thought about hitting each racket with one set.
In addition, out of these three, which one would you recommend for 4.0-4.5 players? So far, my biggest problem is not strength. On the contrary, my biggest problem is the unforced errors I picked up. I more often put the ball flat behind the baseline instead of kicking it into the net. No matter how strange it sounds, it's as if I have enough power but lack control. **Note: Use Wilson K-Factor 93 inches, I believe it is the 2010 model (my father’s racket), 324 grams. In view of the fact that I often make mistakes, either put the ball behind the baseline, or on the left and right sides of the court, and sometimes kick the ball to the net, although I have a well-trained swing, etc., I do not rule out my current use The racket may be too advanced for me or the head may be too small. Any suggestions for this?
Sorry to ask you the question, I appreciate any answers you can provide...
It is a good idea to hit a set with a demo racket. I did write a guide on how to best demonstrate here – https://www.perfect-tennis.com/tennis-racquet-demo-programs/
K Blade is not easy to play, it must be a serious player's racket. I can't say which racket is best for you, because you have never seen you play before, etc., but it is a good idea to demonstrate these three rackets. If one of them is more suitable for you, you should be able to feel it immediately.
Personally, I would recommend Clash 100 or Pure Strike 100. They are more forgiving than Blade 98, and are suitable for 4.0-4.5. Although Blade 98 may feel most familiar considering that you are currently using K Blade, it actually boils down to which one you prefer...
Yes, Pure Strike 100 has a slightly higher tolerance to 98, but not much...
Thanks, this is very helpful. I will look at the article in question!
I thank all the helpers!
I have been playing tennis with the coach for the past few months. Just a casual type, and have been using headliquidmetal 8 (I started using it a long time ago). If I want to buy a new racket to do better in this regard, what racket would you recommend?
Cool, I suggest to demonstrate some of the 8 rackets I have listed here: https://www.perfect-tennis.com/best-beginner-tennis-racquets/
Pure Drive 2021, Burn 100 (or Clash 100), Pure Aero, Ripstick 100, etc.
Can you recommend me a current powerful racket, I usually hit the ball very flat.
I am an advanced player.
I replied to your comment here and you provided more information – https://www.perfect-tennis.com/extended-length-tennis-racquets/#comment-554497
Your email address will not be published. Required places have been marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time you comment.
No spam, only the latest tennis news.
Thank you for reminding you what tennis can produce. Cancel...
Hi...I just like how FedEx uses SAB to confuse opponents...
Oops, I forgot to change the author, not my work: D...
Thank you so much. The Fed has tried many different methods, such as...
Thanks, Jonathan Tahan, wonderful photos and articles...
Thank you for reminding you what tennis can produce. Cancel...
Hi...I just like how FedEx uses SAB to confuse opponents...
Oops, I forgot to change the author, not my work: D...
Thank you so much. The Fed has tried many different methods, such as...
Thanks, Jonathan Tahan, wonderful photos and articles...
Perfect Tennis started in 2011 as a tennis news website. Since then, it has been one of the largest independent tennis news websites and a platform for fans to share their views on the game.
The site mainly focuses on men’s games and is biased towards Roger Federer, but it also covers Grand Slams, 1,000 and 500 level sports, equipment reviews, strings, and the financial status of each game.
The mission of the site is to give tennis journalists and fans the freedom and creativity in writing, personal reviews, and out-of-the-box analysis.
If you want to know more about perFect tennis and what to expect from the website, please visit the about page.
RT @MartyMakary: I look forward to testifying in Congress this week that the Covid policy is no longer based on clinical data. No…
@MartinKulldorff Paging Deepshit Ghurkinsani and Chris are on the shit creek without Pagel.
RT @MartinKulldorff: Massive "public health scientists", due to their limited understanding of infectious disease epidemiology,...
@tomhfh You think you have omicron, but you are sure it will be better if you poke it a third time😂
Are you aware that the "vaccine passport" is just the predecessor of the digital biometric system?